PRED 356 Methods of Science and Mathematics Teaching
Chapter 3: Introduction to Methods and Direct Instruction
 
 
<< PREVIOUS   |   CONTENTS   |   NEXT >>
 
 
  Guided Student Practice

Presentation of stimulus material is followed by eliciting practice in the desired behavior. The purpose is to help the students become firm and in the new material. This is effectively done by:.

  • Create as nonevaluative an atmosphere as possible;
  • Guiding for student understanding and areas of hesitancy
  • Correcting errors
  • Providing for a large number of successful repetitions.
  • Guiding a student practice is made by Prompting.
  • Verbal prompts (VP)
  • Gestural prompts (GP)
  • Physical prompts (PP)
  • Prompting is an important part of eliciting the desired behavior, because it strenghens and builds the learners’ confidence by encouraging them to use some aspects of the answer that have already been given in formulating the correct response.
    Prompts
    Definition
    Examples
    VP
    VP can be cues, reminders, or instructions to learners to help them perform correctly the skill you are teaching. “Leave a space between words” reminds him
    what you previously said about neat
    handwriting
    GP
    GP model or demonstrate for learners a particular skill you want them to perform. Make a “push” gesture with your hand, you would be promting, or reminding, the student
    to perform this step of the process.
    PP
    With a PP, you use hand-over-hand assistance to guide the learners to the correct performance. You might verbally describe how to form the letter and demonstrate this for the learner and the learner may still be unable to write a correctly. In such a case you might use your hand to guide the learner’s hand as the writes.
    Use Forms of Prompting
    Types
    Definition
    Least-to-Most
    Intrusive Prompting
    Verbal prompts are least intrusive, while physical prompts are most intrusive. It would be more appropriate , first, to say “don’t forget the fine adjustment!” when guiding a learner in the use of a microscope than to take the learner’s hand and physically assist her.
    Full-Class
    Prompting
    You can also check for understanding and prompt for correct responses using the full class. The teacher asked all the students to respond privately at the same time and then encouraged them to ask for individula help
      Feedback and Correctives

    You need strategies for handling right and wrong answers. Based on several studies it is identified that there are four broad categories of student response.
  • Correct, quick and firm (CQF)
  • Correct but hesitant (CH)
  • Incorrect due to carelessness (IC)
  • Incorrect due to lack of knowledge (ILK)
  • Explanations
    Best FC
    CQF
    Such a response most frequently occurs during the latter stages of a lesson or unit.For most learning that involves knowledge acquisition, make steps between successive portions of your lesson small enough to produce approximately 60% to %80 correct answers in a practice and feedback session.
    Your best response to a CQF student response is to ask another question of the same student. This inceases potential for feedback or, if time does not permit, to move on quickly to another question and student. Once 60% to %80 right answers are produced, you will have created a rythm and momentum that heighten student attention and engagement and provide for a high level task orientation

    CH
    This type occurs frequently in a practice and feedback session at the beginning or middle of a lesson. Positive feedback (“Good” or “that is correct”) to the student who supplies CH response is essential. Affirmative replies seldom effect significant change on a subsequent problem of the same type. Discovering the precise reason for a hesitant response is desirable but it takes time. A quick restatement of the facts , rule needed to obtain the right answer often accomplishes the same end more efficiently.
    IC
    As many as 20% of student responses fall into this category. When this occurs, you feel that they really know the correct response, you may be tempted to scold, admonish, or even verbally punish students for responing toughtlessly.
    Verbal punishment rarely teaches students to avoid careless mistakes.Emotional reaction rarely has positive effect, so best procedure is to acknowledge that the answer is wrong and to move immediately to the next student for the correct response. You will make a point to the careless student that he or she lost the opportunity for a correct response and the praise that goes with it.
    ILK
    Such errors typically occur, sometimes in large numbers, during the initial stages of a lesson or unit. The goal is not to get the correct answer from the student but to enagage the learner in the process by which the right answer can be found. It is better to provide hints, probe, or change the question or stimulus to a simpler one that engages the student in finding the correct response than to simply give the student the correct response.
       
     
    The most common strategies for incorrect responses are the following:
  • Review key facts or rules needed for a correct solution,
  • Explain the steps used to reach a correct solution,
  • Prompt with clues or hints representing a partially correct answer,
  • Take a different but similar problem, and guide the student to the correct answer.
  • Finally, note that when you use the direct instruction model for teaching facts, rules, and sequences, you should not allow an incorrect answer to go undetected or uncorrected.

      Independent Practice

    Once you have successfully elicited the behavior, provided feedback, and administered correctives, students need the opportunity to practice the behavior independently. Often this is the time when facts and rules come together to form action sequences.

    Independent practice provides the opportunity in a careful controlled and organized environment to make a meaningful whole out of the bits and pieces.

    The purpose of providing opportunities for all types of independent practice is to develop automatic responses in student, so they no longer need to recall each individual unit of content but can use all the units simultaneously.

      Weekly and Monthly Reviews

    Periodic review ensures that you have taught all task-relevant information needed for future lessons and that you have identified areas that require the reteaching of key facts, rules and sequences. Without periodic review, you have no way of knowing whether direct instruction has been successful in teaching facts, rules, and sequences.

    Weekly and monthly reviews also help determine whether the pace is right or whether to adjust it before covering too much content.

    Another obvious advantage of weekly and monthly reviews is that they strenghten correct but hesitant response.

    A regular weekly review is the key to performing this direct instruction dimension. The weekly review is intended to build momentum. Momentum results from gradually increasing the coverage and depth of the weekly reviews.


      1.4 Other Forms of Direct Instruction

    Direct instruction has been discussed as though it occurs only in a expository and lecturing format. This perhaps the most popular format for Direct Instruction but is by no means the only one. Other ways of executing the Direct Instruction model include
  • Peer and cross-age tutoring
  • The use of computer as an information provider
  • Various kinds of audiolingual and communication tools
  • Because these alternative approaches are much less under control than is the lecturing - expository format you create , you should carefully consider their applicability to your specific instructional goals and students.

    Finally, programmed instruction, computer assisted instruction software, specialized media, and information and communicaiton technologies follow a direct instructon model most closely when they are programmed for basic academic skills.
     
    << PREVIOUS   |  CONTENTS   |   NEXT >>